|
CNTs contain enzymes that do their damage by
impairing neuronal exocytosis (the process by which neurotransmitter
is released into a synapse). In normal function, it is believed
that assembly of SNAREs (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor
attachment protein receptors) into a low-energy ternary complex
catalyzes membrane fusion, which precipitates the neurotransmitter
release.
CNTs interfere with this process by degrading SNAREs, a process
called proteolysis. Toxins like botulinum neurotoxins are two-chain
polypeptides with a heavy chain joined by a disulphide bond to
a light chain. CNT light chains are part of a unique group of zinc-dependent
endopeptidases (enzymes) that catalyze hydrolysis of peptide bonds
within other proteins. When such chains catalyze SNARE hydrolysis
at specific sites, membrane fusion is attenuated and neurotransmitter
release inhibited.
The means by which a CNT properly identifies and cleaves its target
SNARE has been a subject of much speculation. It is thought to
use one or more regions of enzyme–substrate interaction (exosites)
remote from the active site where hydrolysis occurs. To address
this question, the Stanford team used x-ray diffraction data from
ALS Beamlines 8.2.1 and 8.2.2 and SSRL Beamline 9-2 to determine
the first structure of the light chains of a CNT endopeptidase
(the protease botulinum neurotoxin serotype A or BoNT/A) in complex
with its target SNARE (human SNAP-25).
In their structure, an α exosite is formed by BoNT/A light-chain
helices α1–α4 that bind to the helical N-terminal
of the substrate SNAP-25. Contacting side chains between the SNAP-25
substrate and the BoNT/A light chain at the α exosite are
located along the helices. A β exosite resides on the opposite
face of BoNT/A. The C-terminal of SNAP-25 forms an antiparallel β sheet
along with a portion of a “250 loop,” which is separated
from the zinc-containing active site where substrate cleavage occurs
by a “370 loop.” Additional exosites (anchor points)
also include side-chain contacts between the substrate and the
light chain.
Three different views of the complex between
SNAP-25 (red) and BoNT/A (tan). The views are related by the
specified rotations around a vertical axis in the plane of the
figure that goes through the center of the complex. Shown are
the α exosite (green arrow and circle), BoNT/A light-chain helices
(tan) α1–α4, the helical N-terminal of the substrate (red), approximate
locations (green) of contacting side chains involved in the α
exosite, the β exosite (blue arrow and circle), the “250 loop” (light blue),
the active site (Zn2+, purple sphere), the “370 loop” (light blue),
approximate locations (dark blue) of contacting side chains involved
in the β exosite, and the approximate locations (yellow) of other
exosites (anchor points) involved in side-chain contacts.
Based on their structure and available kinetic data for several
mutant SNAP-25 substrates, the researchers concluded that most
of this unusually large enzyme–substrate interface serves to provide
a substrate-specific boost to catalytic efficiency by reducing
KM (the Michaelis constant), so that the substrate is properly
oriented with respect to the light chain. They also observed significant
structural changes near the toxin's catalytic pocket upon substrate
binding, probably serving to render the protease competent for
catalysis.
According to a general model of the strategy used by BoNT/A to
recognize and cleave SNAP-25 based on this structure, SNAP-25 attaches
to a presynaptic membrane via palmitylation (fatty acid binding)
sites on its linker domain. The N-terminal (sn1) and C-terminal
(sn2) domains are unstructured or flexible in uncomplexed SNAP-25.
Binding of BoNT/A is probably initiated by helix formation at the
α exosite, and the anchor points along the extended portion
of SNAP-25 serve as additional determinants of substrate specificity.
These sites reduce KM and enhance binding at the β exosite,
thereby inducing conformational changes at the zinc active site
that render the endopeptidase competent to cleave its substrate.
Exosite-based model of BoNT/A substrate recognition.
Left: SNAP-25 attaches to a presynaptic membrane via palmitylation
sites (black) on its linker domain (purple). Center: Helix formation
at the α exosite probably initiates binding of BoNT/A (blue)
to the SNAP-25 C-terminal domain (green), and the anchor points
along the domain (green notches) increase substrate specificity.
Right: The resulting enhanced binding at the β exosite
induces conformational changes at the active site (AS) that allow
cleavage of the SNAP-25.
Ultimately, the novel structures of the substrate-recognition
exosites could be used for designing inhibitors specific to BoNT/A.
Research conducted by M.A. Breidenbach (Stanford University) and
A.T. Brunger (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University,
and Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory).
Research funding: National Institutes of Health and Howard Hughes
Medical Institute. Operation of the ALS is supported by the U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences.
Publication about this research: M.A. Breidenbach and A.T. Brunger, “Substrate
recognition strategy for botulinum neurotoxin serotype A,” Nature 432,
925 (2004). |